Light is excited from the sun, travels through space, and enters the human eye. The wave-particle duality of light is ultimately perceived by the retina... In this process, we perceive light through our eyes, but according to "Beyond Biocentrism," we also have another unknown system.
In the forbidden area of the Mo Family's mechanical city in the Qin Dynasty, Gao Yue once recalled the scene of watching stars in the Yan Kingdom. On a winter night, Gao Yue gazed at the cloudless night sky alone. No matter how wide she opened her eyes, she couldn't see the stars in the sky. Her mother told her to close her eyes and "see" with her "heart." After that, the stars appeared.
Unlike some meticulous thinkers, my world does not come from reasoning, but from personal feelings and preferences. It sounds good to call it intuition, otherwise it's speculation. But, so what? I really like the phrase, "so what?"
When writing an article, some people believe that it should not be scattered, and it should be understandable, focusing on one thing. The strong purposefulness makes people lose their way. Some people believe that it should cater to the fast-paced nature of modern young people, with videos as the main focus and strong interactivity. Some people believe that articles should not be repetitive, and should not follow the crowd. Some people believe that there are writers and authors...
I disagree with all of the above. The root cause lies in the question, "Who is the article written for?"
The story of the "infinite monkey theorem" has truly changed my perspective. I used to think that articles were naturally born and created by talented hands. But now, articles are not naturally born, and talented hands are not accidental. How many times do you have to type the phrase "so what" with the 26 letters of the alphabet? 26 to the power of 6. The difficulty increases exponentially with each additional word. According to the book, it would take millions of monkeys typing for hundreds of trillions of years to form a sentence, which is roughly thousands of times the age of the universe (theoretical). The generation of words, articles, and information cannot be natural, but can only be human-made. Is the information we create just a coincidence? I increasingly don't think so. It's all too coincidental, to the point where I have doubts about it. I value articles that come from within, rather than articles derived from logical deduction.
In "Physicality and Humanity," more people fall into physicality. Just like writing articles, more people fall into strong purposefulness. More people only use their eyes to see the world, not their hearts. More people use inanimate objects to observe living beings... Whether this world is dead or alive depends on the individual.
We are afraid to close our eyes, afraid to lose the light, but we are destined to lose this layer of light. This kind of light is actually the greatest darkness. Little do we know, in the darkness, we have a higher vision. Although the sun gives us light, it obscures the starlight. The abundance of stars is not useless to us, but rather, we lack the ability to reach them, and this ability is based on moving away from the sun. Who would be willing to give up the warmth within reach?
In fact, all these things I've said can be destroyed with one phrase, "so what?"
Summer nights are difficult, but the autumn equinox has arrived, which is both the death knell of all things and the beginning of another perception.
- Miscellaneous Notes on the Eve of the Beginning of Autumn, July 10, 2022